Piper is a college freshman
er, I mean, he reasons like one.
And people wonder why I don't take theologians seriously.
I'm not sure how to interpret the Grammys this year. Naturally, I hate them, but it's not without reason. They always pick the wrong artist or fail to nominate an artist that is deserving of at least that. So, when the picks for best new artist and best album of the year were announced I was forced to begin the process of reassessing my disdain for the awards.
So a friend and I have been having some fairly intense conversations about morality and its foundations over the past year and a half. He's recently given up religious faith but has struggled in understanding how to build an ethical system apart from God - not that it's difficult to build or take oneself to have a set of normative claims in any way, which of course, it's not. Rather, he sees himself as gripped by a sharp skepticism in the fallout of his deconversion. How he feels compelled to act, doing very good work supporting human rights and raising third world orphans, seems ungrounded despite my best effort to offer explanations for good and right acts. Such explanations have been natural as with evolutionary explanations to brute fact grounding - turns out the universe just has moral facts.